4530.0 - Crime Victimisation, Australia, 2014-15 Quality Declaration 
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 17/02/2016   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All


VICTIMISATION EXPERIENCES IN VICTORIA Endnote 1, Endnote 2, Endnote 3

This section contains the victimisation and reporting rates for selected crime types for Victoria. Estimates for Victoria were compared with the national estimates to identify any differences that were statistically significant. Where significant differences existed, they are discussed here.

PERSONAL CRIME (Tables 4 and 9)

Graph Image for VICTIMISATION RATES(a), Selected personal crimes, Victoria and Australia, 2014-15

Footnote(s): (a) The total number of persons experiencing a crime in a given population, expressed as a percentage of that population.

Source(s): VICTIMISATION RATES(a), Selected personal crimes, Victoria and Australia, 2014-15-2014-15 Vic-Aust VR graph - PC



Total assault

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 206,100 persons in Victoria (4.4%)Endnote 3 experienced assault. One in three persons who experienced assault experienced a single incident (33% or 68,500), 20% (40,900) experienced two incidents, and 44% (90,400) experienced three or more incidents.

Physical assault

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 97,800 persons in Victoria (2.1%) experienced physical assault.

Of these, 51,300 (52%) reported the most recent incident to police.

Just over a third of physical assault victims (38% or 37,500) experienced a single incident and another 35% (34,100) experienced three or more incidents.

Total threatened assault

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 138,800 persons in Victoria (2.9%)Endnote 3 experienced threatened assault. One in three victims of threatened assault experienced a single incident (33% or 45,100), while almost half (47% or 64,900) experienced three or more incidents.

Face-to-face threatened assault

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 130,800 persons in Victoria (2.8%) experienced face-to-face threatened assault.

Of these, 40% (52,000) reported the most recent incident to police.

Non face-to-face threatened assault

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 49,600 persons in Victoria (1.0%) experienced non face-to-face threatened assault.


HOUSEHOLD CRIME (Tables 3 and 5)

Graph Image for VICTIMISATION RATES(a), Selected household crimes, Victoria and Australia, 2014-15

Footnote(s): (a) Total number of households that experienced the crime type, expressed as a percentage of the all households population.

Source(s): VICTIMISATION RATES(a), Selected household crimes, Victoria and Australia, 2014-15-2014-15 Vic-Aust VR graph - HC



Break-in

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 55,900 households in Victoria (2.5%) experienced a break-in.

Of these, 42,000 (75%) reported the most recent incident to police.

Attempted break-in

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 37,500 households in Victoria (1.7%) experienced an attempted break-in.

Motor vehicle theft

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 14,000 households in Victoria (0.6%) experienced motor vehicle theft.

Theft from a motor vehicle

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 74,600 households in Victoria (3.3%) experienced theft from a motor vehicle.

Of these, 41,300 (55%) reported the most recent incident to police.

Malicious property damage

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 142,200 households in Victoria (6.3%) experienced malicious property damage.

Of these, 74,100 (69%) reported the most recent incident to police.

Other theft

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 75,200 households in Victoria (3.4%) experienced other theft.

Of these, 27,700 (37%) reported the most recent incident to police.

The victimisation rate for other theft in Victoria (3.4%) was higher than the national rate (2.9%).

ENDNOTES

Endnote 1 Data for number of victims, victimisation and reporting rates are not discussed where the relative standard error (RSE) for the estimates is greater than 25%. This has resulted in some crime types being excluded from this commentary text. These data are available in Table 2; users are advised to exercise caution when interpreting these estimates.

Endnote 2 All comparisons discussed have been tested for statistical significance with a 95% level of confidence that there is a real difference in the two populations being tested. Only data with a relative standard error (RSE) of less than 25% are referred to in the text of this publication and these estimates are considered sufficiently reliable for general use. To determine whether there is a statistical difference between any other two estimates, significance testing should be undertaken. For further information, refer to the Technical Note.

Endnote 3 This number is not published in the accompanying tables, but can be obtained by dividing the number of victims of a selected crime type by the relevant population total (in this case, the total population of persons over the age of 15 in Victoria).